P-G2Q FUEL DISPENSER

P-G2Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm) :Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp): 1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type :Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset Function :Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :215kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1060*550*1620(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 44 20ft: 22

ents on metrological management. The chapter briefly introduces fuel dispenser’s metrological management and technical requirements, appraisal related and attentions. Article I Metrological management and technical requirements In accordance with The Law on Metrology of fuel dispenser’s legal management mainly includes following fuel dispenser aspects: Model approval, initial approval, subsequent appraisal and inspection in operation. Model approval refers to an entire test, examination and assessment as to new model’s entire performance. Initial approval refers to assess whether or not the fuel dispenser made by manufacturer in accordance with the model having been ratification through a series of testing, as well as metrological performance with relative metrological rules and regulations. Initial approval really has two phases �- approval combined with factory test, and testing appraisal after installation. Subsequent appraisal is conducted after long time since initial appraisal, from which considerable appraisal period is set down according to related requirements. Periodical appraisal is also regarded as the continued subsequent appraisal. Fuel dispenser’s measuring performance within appraisal period needs to be examined, so filling station should deploy self-check standard instrument (no less than 20L) to examine and inspect. Apart from applied to fu fuel dispenser el dispenser approval, JJG443-98 also adapt sample testing and pattern evaluation. Although there are two items of accuracy and flow distance ratio fuel dispenser conducted in initial approval and subsequent evaluation, there are other technical parameters different from approval as for fuel dispenser made after passing pattern evaluation, including minimum calculated volume and minimum cubic variable. Several items reference to the pattern evaluation and sampling testing of mechanical hydraulic section of fuel dispenser as followed: Accuracy testing The testing’s purpose is to define the flow curve and verify the tolerance scope in which the allowed maximum tol

will have to implement it　　 as described above. The acceptability of a PCD between　　 the Site ControllerCD in this environment will have to be　　 checked with the body responsible for giving the W M　　 approval.　　March 2006 IFSF - STANDARD FORECOURT PROTO fuel dispenser COL FP31_2.23　　 DISPENSER APPLICATION　　 Page: 81　　 81 Bin16 W(1-9) M　　 W M_Seed　　 (51H) (0-65535)　　 To allow the CD to configure the seed used by the　　 dispenser to calculate the W M security checksum.　　 Please note that in implementations where the W M_Seed　　 may not be changed. The Write should be rejected with a　　 Data_ACK of 2 (Not writable).　　 Please note that this Data_Id is a write only field. Any　　 attempt to read it must result in the answer message being　　 returned with the Data_Id s Data_Lg set to zero (i.e.　　 80 00).　　 PCD Comment:　　 fuel dispenser The PCD is likely to be solely responsible for the　　 generation of the W M checksum so where the W M　　 functio fuel dispenser nality is required the PCD will have to implement it　　 as described above. The acceptability of a PCD between　　 the Site ControllerCD in this environment will have to be　　 checked with the body responsible for giving the W M　　 approval.　　 MANUFACTURER OIL COMPANY SPECIFIC　　 200　　 to Free to the manufacturer oil company　　 255　　FP31_2.23 IFSF - STANDARD

will give Italians even more reasons to complain. Meanwhile, preparations for the construction of the Lyon-Turin high-speed railway provide plenty of opportunities to argue over funding, delays and environmental concerns. The project encapsulates relations between the two countries the Italians will grumble, the French will make i fuel dispenser t happen, but both sides will ultimately benefit from the connection. © 2006 .  About sponsorship Face value Booming Mr Boeing Jul 27th 2006 From The Economist print edition James McNerney is putting Boeing s house in order after a series of scandals Landov HE CERTAINLY took his time accepting the job. In late 2003 Boeing lost its chairman and chief executive, Phil Condit, along with his probable successor, in a scandal over some Pentagon contracts. James McNerney, who sat on Boeing s board and was a former boss of the aero-engine business of General Electric, was an obvious candidate to fill Mr Condit s large shoes. But he wasn t ready. Having lost out in the bitter race to succeed Jack Welch for what must count as the most prestigious job in American business, Mr McNerney had decided to move on in 2001 to 3M, a large technology company fuel dispenser , which he had begun to lead out of a rough patch. So Boeing sought to plug the gap by hauling Harry Stonecipher, an industry veteran who had p fuel dispenser reviously acted as the company s president and chief operating officer, out of retirement. But in early 2005 he, too, found himself mired in scandal his relationship with a senior female colleague surfaced publicly in e- mails so embarrassing that it cost him his job. With a caretaker installed as interim chief executive, Lew Platt, the respected former boss of Hewlett-Packard and a Boeing board member, was given the job of finding a permanent replacement. It seemed to take for ever. Mr Platt was quickly on t